In other
words, they learn to expect shaming experiences, they learn to hide their
flawed sense of self from others, and they interact with others in a way that
increases the likelihood of receiving shaming messages.
With shame, people experience an
accompanying desire to disappear or hide, or to “break into a thousand pieces”.
More frequent and intense experiences with shame eventually lead to an
internalization of shame. Internalization of shame is a condition in which a
person feels flawed at their very core. They experience a “badness” about
themselves that does not change regardless of their actions. Some experience
this as “not ever being good enough”, “having a bad effect on others”, and
“being broken in some way but not being certain about how or why they are
broken”.
According
to many theorists (Harper & Hoopes, 1990; Kaufman, 1996), the
internalization of shame has roots in the dynamics of interpersonal
relationships early in life and is subsequently influenced by interactions with
peers, teachers, extended family, and in adult contexts such as romantic
relationships and work. Internalization of shame, sometimes referred to as
proneness to shame (Cook, 1996), is related to the absence of three processes
in families which Harper & Hoopes (1990) referred to as the affirmation
triangle. The three processes are accountability, intimacy, and appropriate
dependency. When any one of these processes is absent in family relationships,
individuals will experience and internalize shame.
In
conditions where dependency, accountability, or intimacy are absent, children
internalize shame and become shame prone meaning that they begin to view the
world as a place where they expect shame from others and actually do things
that bring shame upon them. The received the message that they are inconvenient
to their parents, that their basic feelings are inappropriate, and their
interpersonal world is unpredictable.
According
to Panskepp (2004), while people have the inherent capacity to experience
affects of different kinds, the environment they are raised in interacts with
these affect programs in their brains and can increase the likelihood that an
individual will use certain affect programs over others. An example would be a
child who experiences a lot of fear training his affect systems to more easily
and quickly go to fear. When a child feels anger, fear, or sadness, if the
parent is threatened by the presence of emotion in the child, or if the parent
sends a message that the emotion is inappropriate or inconvenient, the child
will experience shame, and when this happens frequently, children will
internalize shame and assume that something about them is flawed because the
feelings emanate from them but seem to be rejected by others as something bad.
Over time the internalization of shame leads to what Miller (2008) calls a
presentation of a false self in which a person presents an image to others that
is not congruent with their internal experience of themselves and their world.
According
to Kaufman (1996), individuals proceed through several steps to finally
internalizing shame. In the first stage, they exhibit self contempt, self
blaming, and negative comparisons of themselves to others. As they continue to
give more energy to such thoughts and behaviors, they move to stage II in which
they begin to disown attachment needs, feelings, and what Kaufman calls self
clusters such as the child self, the adolescent self, and the needing self. In
time an individual eventually moves to the third stage in which splitting,
seeing the self as all negative and others as all positive, takes over. The
final step in the process is one in which the whole person bases their identity
on shame. They arrive at the conclusion that it is better to receive affirmation
for one’s badness rather than no acknowledgement at all. In family systems
without a healthy affirmation triangle (accountability, intimacy, and
dependency) this development sequence for shame proceeds fairly quickly and at
young ages.
Fearing
discovery, the shame based person reacts first by distancing in the
relationship so that the anticipated discovery of shame by the other person and
the feared abandonment and rejection when their shame is discovered is never
realized. Becoming defensive and blaming others is also used to protect oneself
from intense experience of shame. Substance use and sexual compulsivity are
behaviors that are often used to avoid the more dark feelings of shame. While
these activities do not resolve the internalized shame, they help individuals
temporarily feel better and suspend for a time the feelings of shame.
Unfortunately, the shame usually returns with more intensity as the individual
deals with their feelings about their behavior or experiences the interpersonal
disruptions that are often accompanied by drug and alcohol use and sexual
behavior outside the relationship. Self harm, eating disorders and rage are
also ways of defending against shame. Again, they do not resolve internalized
shame, and they contribute to become more shame prone, but they allow people to
escape for a short time from the intense shame affect. Fee & Tangney (2000)
found that procrastination was another way of avoiding the risk of being
shamed.
Compass of Shame
Scale, CoSS (Elison, Pulos, &, Lennon, 2006; Nathanson, 1992).- This scale
measures use of the four shame coping styles, namely Attack Self, Withdrawal,
Attack Other, and Avoidance. In the Withdrawal category, a person acknowledges
the experience as negative, accepts shame’s message as valid, and tries to hide
from the situation. In the Attack Self category, the person experience is
negative, shame is internalized, and anger is turned inward on the self. A
person in the Avoidance category does not acknowledge the negative experience
of self, denies the message of shame, and distracts from painful feeling. In
the Attack Other category, a person often does not accept the negative
experience of self and often denies the shame message the negative experience
of self, typically does not accept shame’s message, and then blames or
ridicules someone else.
At its core, Brown says, shame “is the intensely painful feeling
or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love
and belonging.
he end result, says Tamar Chansky, PhD, author of Freeing
Yourself from Anxiety (Da Capo, 2012), “is that we
feel bad about who we are. And in a preemptive strike, rather than waiting to
be shunned, we hide” or engage in other distancing behaviors. “Then we think we
aren’t deserving of good things; we become very negative about ourselves and
our world gets much smaller.”
And a bit from: Shutting Shame Down
The Catch-22, of
course, is that shame creates emotional patterns that make us reluctant to face
it down. After all, who wants to look inward when what’s staring back is a
painful emotion that makes us feel unworthy and unlovable? Ultimately, though,
avoiding or suppressing this universal feeling can result in long-term
emotional and physical consequences that trump the short-term discomfort that
accompanies self-analysis and honesty.
“We’re afraid that people won’t like us if they know the truth
about who we are, where we come from, what we believe, how much we’re
struggling, or, believe it or not, how wonderful we are when soaring.”
The emotional
experience of shame is fueled by negative self-talk. The messages we tell
ourselves in these moments, says Brown, are always a variation of “never good
enough.”
To compound matters, says Neff, people often have a lot of
self-judgment about their shame, and it becomes a nasty cycle: An emotional
wave washes over you, you blame yourself for getting stuck in a spiral of
unworthiness, and then you feel even less deserving. Shame feeds shame. But by
cultivating resiliency we can interrupt this negative emotional loop.
WOMEN'S shame generally centers on appearance and the need to be
perceived as perfect. What’s more, women feel pressure to achieve beauty and
perfection without appearing to put in any effort. If someone sees them sweat,
it doesn’t count.
Good thing I happen to have that session with Jacqui coming up, and with that social worker Jerilyn next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment